Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-) |
---|---|
From: | "Bill Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 10 May 2007 21:47:49 -0500 |
> Hm. Why, then, do I keep hearing pros say that the OM system was > definitely > one of the better professional systems out there? > The party line around here was that, although the glass was exceptional, the bodies were too delicate. Compared to the Nikon F and the Canon F1, that was hard to argue, but I know a nationally regarded Canon pro that formerly shot Nikons, and destroyed them regularly. Bill Pearce ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Bill Pearce |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Jay Maynard |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |