Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-) |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 May 2007 08:33:33 +1000 |
The lesson of the OM-1 was that it was never considered a pro camera except by a tiny minority and was never a market leader. Some lesson. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 11/05/2007, at 1:45 AM, Jay Maynard wrote: > Indeed. That they argued that the E-1 neede to be bigger to be > considered > "professional" just shows that *Olympus* didn't learn the lesson of > the > OM-1. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: 5D, 6D, CS3 (Was 7-14mm or 5D - sorry to raise it again), Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Jay Maynard |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Jay Maynard |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |