Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-) |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 May 2007 12:10:36 +1000 |
...and what about National Geographic ? ...Wayne > Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote: > OMs were the cameras UPI issued to all their photographers in 'Nam, so I think that would qualify for pro status. Walt Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Walt Wayman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Bill Pearce |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Walt Wayman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Why no FourThirds DSLR the size of a Pentax Auto110? ;-), Bill Pearce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |