Subject: | [OM] Re: PMA Show |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:52:37 -0500 |
I don't need ISO 3200 for a wedding. I normally shoot 400 with flash for low light. What I needed was fast and accurate auto-focus in the dark. But I shot some pretty good looking stuff at 3200 yesterday. I may give it a go again without the flash. Chuck Norcutt AG Schnozz wrote: > NSURIT WROTE: >> Perhaps, the boat by not buying a Can*n. > > Amen, bro. With the latest/greatest 1DmarkIIIn-lv-use it in the rain > and watch it die, wonderbrick, I'm actually thinking for the first > time how nice it would be to get one of those E-510s as a second > camera. The crying and moaning on how you NEED ISO 3200 to > photograph a wedding has already began. > > You know what is the biggest turnoff for me on Canon? Canon users. > > End of rant > > AG > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > The fish are biting. > Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. > http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: IR film to discover heat losses?, Rand E |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Epson V-700 vs Canon 2710, Paul Poropat |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: PMA Show, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: PMA Show, ScottGee1 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |