Resend. The first line got lopped off on the first go-around for some
reason.
Chuck
When I went to review all the hoopla over Canyon 5D dust it turned out
that most of the commentary had to do with dust in the viewfinder vs
dust on the sensor. I think some folks have more money than knowledge
and don't know the difference.
It has been my experience that the viewfinder picks up dust faster than
the OM's or at least makes it more visible for some reason. However,
it's easily cleaned by removing the screen and giving it and the bottom
of the pentaprism and the inside of the mirror box a little swipe with a
little piece of Swiffer Duster. Just be sure to examine the Duster for
short threads created by the cutting and get rid of them. You probably
don't want them stuck in the shutter blades. I've used the same method
on my OM's.
I recently cleaned the 5D's sensor for the first time (wet cleaning with
methanol, PecPads and a small cut-down spatula) and managed to
substitute one largish looking thread for the 30 or 40 small specks that
were previously there. The small specs only showed up on blue sky at
small apertures but the thread is visible on light backgrounds at f/8.
Based on the number of pixels it crosses it must be 1.2mm long. Maybe
it's one of those Swiffer Duster threads :-) I just got some cosmetic
mask brushes the other day from an ebay source and will try them soon
according to this guide:
<http://www.prime-junta.net/pont/How_to/a_Brush_Your_Sensor/a_Brush_Your_Sensor.pdf>
although a single spec might be better removed with this tool.
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=387284&is=REG&addedTroughType=search>
or it's fancier brother:
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=387283&is=REG&addedTroughType=search>
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> AG Schnozz wrote:
>>Except for the critters on your sensor, of course.
>>
>
> That's not been a problem. I have to speculate, as I've heard others do,
> that some early 5Ds must have has a manufacturing problem that C has
> fixed. Of course, I haven't used it very heavily and don't change lenses
> all that often....
>
> When there was a thread on sensor cleaning a bit ago, I decided to
> check. There were only a few bits, maybe three that might show in
> anything but an enormous print and all but a few very subtle ones
> disappeared with a few puffs of a rubber blower. I've never seen any at
> all in an image not shot to find them so far.
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|