Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Short translation? |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:10:52 -0400 |
I finally did what I should have done in the first place which was to go look up "despond" in my Webster's dictionary. There its primary definition is an intransitive verb. Chuck Norcutt Chris Barker wrote: > No, I've never heard "despond" as a verb. It's archaic English and > it's a noun. > > It is normally "despondency" now but it could have been an artistic > contraction. If only I could remember the poetry or prose where I > read it. It might have been a bit from "Paradise Lost". > > Chris ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Printer recommendation, David Carter |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Short translation?, Bernard Frangoulis |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Short translation?, keith_w |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Short translation?, Bernard Frangoulis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |