Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Short translation? |
---|---|
From: | Bernard Frangoulis <lists@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:36:17 +0200 |
>And in the New Oxford Dictionary of English as well. But the "Origin" >paragraph mentions that "the word was originally used as a noun in slough of >despond". Actually I should have spelt "Slough of Despond", I guess. And it is "sleu", not "sluf" (trying to render the phonetic alphabet here). Learning... Bernard ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Short translation?, Bernard Frangoulis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] OM lenses on Canon bodies, Mostly |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Short translation?, Bernard Frangoulis |
Next by Thread: | [OM] OM lenses on Canon bodies, Mostly |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |