I'm going to agree here, and throw in another annoyance: I completely
despise the name "EVOLT". I guess the name is intended to sound like
"emote", which means "to express emotion". But, it drives me up the wall.
The letter "E" plus a number does just fine. I also don't like the name
"EOS", but at least it doesn't look like a misspelling!
I think I recall reading that the Evolt term is only used for the American
market...i'm not sure why Olympus America thought the extra name was better.
Cheers,
Robert Swier
Toronto
On 9/28/05, Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I just hate Olympus' marketing department. Electrostatically charged
> sensors? Besides being covered by a filter that can be grounded, the
> sensor is about as electrostatically charged as a battery. And we
> know what a problem dirt accumulating on the camera battery is.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2005, at 5:40 AM, John Hermanson wrote:
>
> >
> > Exclusive Dust Free Technology for Spot-Free Photos
> > Dust is all around us, and when swapping out a lens on a digital
> > single-lens
> > reflex camera there's a chance that a camera's electro-statically
> > charged
> > image sensor will attract micro dust that can ruin photos. Since
> > the main
> > advantage of using an SLR camera is the ability to change lenses
> > for better
> > imaging effects, Olympus has developed a way for photographers to
> > enjoy the
> > freedom of using all the lenses of the Olympus E-System in the most
> > challenging, dusty environments without compromising image quality.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|