I agree with Chris. And the C5060 shot's bokeh almost gives me a headache. To
me, although an admitted bokeh clod, that shot has a serious case of bad bokeh.
http://www.zuik.net/E1/C5060_bokeh_P8260097.jpg
And put on some clothes! Where are your big boy pants? :-)
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message from Chris Barker : --------------
>
> Wayne
>
> Although I like both shots (the flower being particularly attractive) I
> could not say the same about the out of focus areas. That does not
> look like attractive bokeh to me.
>
> Chris
>
> On 27 Aug 2004, at 2:52, Wayne S wrote:
>
> > Another bokeh shot, for real. taken today.
> >
> > http://www.zuik.net/E1/E-1_bokeh_8264576.jpg
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > E-1, 50-200 @ 184mm, F-5.6. All sharpening disabled. Converted with
> > adobe camera raw, tweaked settings in the raw converter, then tweaked
> > levels in PS. There was grass behind which I though would create an
> > interesting background. I used aperture stop down to check the shot
> > before exposure.
> >
> > \A/yne
> <|_:-)_|>
>
> C M I Barker
> Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
>
> +44 (0)7092 251126
> ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
> http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
> http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
> ... a nascent photo library.
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
