Subject: | [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey? |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:42:34 +0100 |
Oh yes, subject is top ;-) But processing in camera, whether it is sharpening or something else, definitely affects the out-of-focus image quality. Chris On 27 Aug 2004, at 19:59, Wayne S wrote: > http://www.zuik.net/E1/C5060_bokeh_P8260097.jpg was shot in JPEG. > Transport shots were raw. My choice for raw often depends on the > contrast > range of the scene and/or whether I want to wait between shots. > > I don't think a small amount of sharpening affects bokeh too much, > but it can make a subtle difference if you are a bokeh connoisseur. > Subject matters more, IMHO. > > Wayne > <|_:-)_|> C M I Barker Cambridgeshire, Great Britain. +44 (0)7092 251126 ftog at threeshoes.co.uk http://www.threeshoes.co.uk http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko ... a nascent photo library. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Foam in an OM20/G?, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Resistance is futile, Ing. Radovan Faltus |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?, Wayne S |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?, Walt Wayman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |