Subject: | [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc... |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:20:22 -0700 |
A couple of minutes in PS can really perk up flat cheap scans. Moose Jim Sharp wrote: >No argument on the OM-4. > >I'll write this whole thing off as a "dumb user" error for now, even >though the photos before and after the suspect one have identical >settings to each other and I have no recollection of changing things in >between. As I looked though the other shots I did notice changing the >metering mode a few times, but that's a different control to the right >of the eyepiece and I distinctly remember changing *that* setting a few >times. > >I'm like you. I tend to set and shoot it if I can, and every time I pick >it up I try to check everything first because more than likely it's >somehow wrong. > >-- >Jim - Who feels a bit embarrassed about having everyone chase a ghost... > > > >Winsor Crosby wrote: > > > >>Because things like white balance, ISO etc are on the mode dial it is >>easy, for example, to change the white balance and rotate back to the >>wrong mode. If you redid that white balance for the next shot and got >>back to the correct mode you might not notice. As someone who thinks >>the OM4T was the most ergonomically perfect camera ever designed, it is >>also difficult for me to sort out or even notice changes on the LCD. >>There are just too many options to check for each shot which is why I >>like to set it up one way and use it that way most of the time. >> >> >> >>Winsor >>Long Beach, California >>USA >>On Jul 10, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Jim Sharp wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > > >============================================== >List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com >List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx >============================================== > > > > -- No attachments (even text) are allowed -- -- Type: image/jpeg -- File: IMG011 adj 8X6a.jpg ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Hunstanton Norfolk #15, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Another page from the journal - warning Non OM image, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc..., Jim Sharp |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc..., Winsor Crosby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |