Subject: | [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc... |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:56:32 -0700 |
The lens may be part of it. The other part is that the jpeg engine built into the camera could be more sharp. Most of the sharpness complaints seem to come from people who are unwilling to shoot raw and do the jpeg conversion in Photoshop. I don't have sharpness problems either. People on the forums who were unhappy because it was more difficult than their Coolpix or G3 were frequently advised to switch to a Fujifilm S2 Pro which seems to the DSLR point and shoot champ with jpegs straight out of the camera. Winsor Long Beach, CA USA On Jul 12, 2004, at 8:14 PM, Jim Sharp wrote: > I'm wondering if some of the sharpness > complaints around the net have to do with people using long non-VR > lenses, or non-Nikon glass. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc..., Jim Sharp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Olympus OM mentioned in Shutterbug, James N. McBride |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc..., Jim Sharp |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E1 vs. 10D, D100, D70, etc..., Tom Scales |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |