Subject: | [OM] Re: 65-200 |
---|---|
From: | "Ian Manners" <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:28:00 +1100 (EDT) |
Hi Daniel >In relation to recent discussion of 35-105's and related bits and pieces. I >spotted this one and though that someone looking for a 65-200 for donor rear >elements might want to consider this one: I dont want the glass, I just want the body :-) Thanks for pointing this one out. Cheers Ian Manners http://www.comkal.net/photo/ The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OM]Now my question 500mmreflex or 300mm tele, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Silly Polaroid SprintScan 4000 question, Humbert Humbert |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 65-200, Daniel Sepke |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tele-Converters., Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |