Subject: | [OM] Re: 65-200 |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:17:32 -0800 |
How do you know it doesn't have the other problem too? Moose fred42@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >In relation to recent discussion of 35-105's and related bits and pieces. I >spotted this one and though that someone looking for a 65-200 for donor rear >elements might want to consider this one. > > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OM]Now my question 500mmreflex or 300mm tele, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: (Fwd) Re: Re: MA-1 ( was olympus Digest V1 #38 ), Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 65-200, Gordon J. Ross |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 65-200, Daniel Sepke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |