On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 10:53:45 -0400
"Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I own the 100/2.8 and no longer own the 100/2. The 100/2 is too
> similar to the 90/2 and both are big and heavy. The 100/2.8 is
> little and light -- much more useful.
>
> That said, I like the 85/2 better than either 100.
Yeah, the 85/2 seems to be making a good companion with the 28/2:
both handle nice, both 49mm filters, both f2....:) Now, that's why I
was so happy that you got me the 28/2 :)
--thomas
>
> Tom
>
> > In terms of actually using these lenses, what is the difference
> > between
> the
> > 100/2 and the 100/2.8 (other than the extra f-stop and being
> > heavier,
> etc.)?
> > If you had both, when would you use one over the other?
> >
> > RickM
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://voop.free.fr/
------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|