ML Archiv: Re: [OM] external metering with extension tubes

Subject:	Re: [OM] external metering with extension tubes
From:	Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 02 Aug 2003 08:08:00 -0400

Good, simple advice.

You don't do this at weddings do you? :-)

Andrew

> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 21:50:46 -0500
> From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ...  Sometimes its easier to calculate
> compensation based on magnification.  With that method, exact isn't
> necessary.  A reasonable estimate works. ...


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, (continued) RE: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, Olaf Greve Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, David Thatcher [OM] WTB Zuiko 28 mm f 2, Angel Lobo Re: [OM] WTB Zuiko 28 mm f 2, Titoy Re: [OM] WTB Zuiko 28 mm f 2, Mark Kronquist Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, Thomas Heide Clausen RE: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, Dick Lague [OM] FS NEw Boxed Olympus OM Screen 1-3, Mark Kronquist Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, Thomas Haegin Re: [OM] external metering with extension tubes, Andrew Gullen <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] [OT] Cellphones, was:Introduction haegint, andrew fildes
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] Help from UK members, were to get film, andrew fildes
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8, Thomas Haegin
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Seeking Zuiko 100 (now Olympus America Issues?), Skip Williams
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]