Rick,
I'd say the 2.0/100 would be nice to have for shooting
stage performances of all kinds where you must not use
a flash. Together with a high speed film, this would
be a powerful available-light configuration.
I would not see any benefit in using it for regular
daylight photography. I like my 2.8/100 specifically
for photographing the children in our family. It lets
you keep a nice distance from them, I find.
I find it too short for many other uses. I use it
rarely I must admit. But for children and portraits I
do like it.
Thomas
--- RickM <zuiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > In terms
of actually using these lenses, what is the
> difference between the
> 100/2 and the 100/2.8 (other than the extra f-stop
> and being heavier, etc.)?
> If you had both, when would you use one over the
> other?
__________________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Logos und Klingeltöne fürs Handy bei http://sms.yahoo.de
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|