Subject: | Re: Re: [OM] OM-3 versus OM-1, results of the Belgian jury. |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 02 May 2003 09:44:06 +1000 |
> Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm sure glad you like your new camera baby. Now you have triplets, > but > you don't have to burp one of them and it can take pics of the other > two. :-) > The finish on the 3Ti is really handsome. > What about the finish on the twins ? Wayne Harridge http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-3 versus OM-1, results of the Belgian jury., Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] The help and generosity of this list - part 2, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: [OM] OM-3 versus OM-1, results of the Belgian jury., mak |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3 versus OM-1, results of the Belgian jury., iwert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |