"Richard F. Man" wrote:
>
>
> Looking at the original scan, it does look harsher than what comes out of
> the 8500, but still better than the original web JPG. I used a Photoshop
> action to "webify" an image and I think in this case, the last step of
> slight sharpening may have sharpen the background a wee bit much. I deleted
> that step and upload a new version. Since I always use ICE when scanning,
> which makes the image a wee bit softer, I always use slight sharpening on
> the output stage.
>
> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/img007_new.jpg This still looks
> harsher than the original UN-webify version in Photoshop and much harsher
> than the 8500 output. I have no idea why.
>
Problem is still appearing on the background, the double lines just
like looking through a heavy astigmatical eye (see the middle left of
the image).
C.H.Ling
> here's the old one
> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/img007.jpg
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
