Subject: | [OM] Re: Vuescan, an HP S20, and me |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:50:29 -0800 |
>From: "IanG" <I@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >Is there any good reason to use Vuescan instead of the Nikon software? Based on C.H.Ling's and my performance experience, no. Others may differ, particularly if performance is not your primary goal. C.H. said he likes Vuescan for certain film. Also, Vuescan is available for MacOS X, but NikonScan is not. Finally, Vuescan works with many scanners. If you have two or more scanners, and don't want to learn two or more scanner drivers, Vuescan may be worth the poorer performance. -- : Jan Steinman -- nature Transography(TM): <http://www.Bytesmiths.com> : Bytesmiths -- artists' services: <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Services> : Buy My Step Van! <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/van> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: even more on-line entries!, Mike |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: WE-02, Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Vuescan, an HP S20, and me, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Vuescan, an HP S20, and me, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |