Subject: | [OM] Re: Vuescan, an HP S20, and me |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 2 Jan 2003 00:06:32 -0800 |
>From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >I can't believe there is >no different in processing time between a 250MHz G3 and 150MHz G1 for >Vuescan. I'm sorry, I should have mentioned my data was for NikonScan. I think we have too many variables here -- processors, speed, software, interface -- to make a rational comparison! :-) But I did find NikonScan on a 150MHz G1 to perform nearly equal to it on a 250MHz G3. -- : Jan Steinman -- nature Transography(TM): <http://www.Bytesmiths.com> : Bytesmiths -- artists' services: <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Services> : Buy My Step Van! <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/van> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Flash question, Albert Yang |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: even more on-line entries!, Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Re: Vuescan, an HP S20, and me, IanG |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Vuescan, an HP S20, and me, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |