On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 03:26:58PM -0400, Jim L'Hommedieu wrote:
> What's your experience with the 200/4? Are you happy with your pictures?
> When I did use it, I never came back with a superbly
> sharp picture like I always do with the 100/2.8. Of course if you need a
> 200, the 100 isn't gonna be a substitute.
My prejudice is that 5 elements isn't enough to make a sharp lens
> of any focal length.
Please recount the elements in your 2.8/100. :-))
Well, according to esif, the 2.8/100; 2.8/135 and 2.8/180
use the same design in combining elements.
Frieder Faig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|