I haven't seen a single post that said the f/5 was 'better', just different.
No question the f/4 is actually, in quality, the better lens. I prefer the
f/5 because it is smaller, but that is personal preference. I think if you
took a vote, the f/4 would win here.
Tom
> I would like to know what the sudden interest in "bashing" the f/4 lens
is.
> For a long time the opinions were that it was a fine lens and worth
owning,
> and now I see lots of discussion about the f/5 lens being better, blah,
> blah, blah.... I thought all Zuikos were good lenses. It took me a while
> to choose to purchase the f/4 and I based my purchase in part on the
> opinions of this list and other OM sources.
>
> Bryan Pilati
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|