Happy?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Wagner" <twag@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 200mm f/4
>
> Thats the beauty of this list. You ask what lens is
> appropriate for vacations and you learn how to avoid and
> survive bear attacks(grizzly and black)their mating
> cycles, cougar encounters, national park regulations,
> camping and hunting seasons, favorite firearms, insect
> repellants...it's your one stop shop
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 17:58:01 -0700
> Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I know how it changed and it is not far from the original
> >subject. Someone suggested that a competent lens could
> >not be designed with 5 elements like the 200/4. It went
> >from there. Someone should have changed the subject, but
> >then again you did not change the subject to something
> >like "Dismay over Lack of Subject/Discussion Congruence".
> >:-)
> >
> >Winsor
> >
> >
> >>What does any of this text have to do with the
> >>subject???? You ask a
> >>question about radial tires, and next thing people are
> >>talking about
> >>chocolate cake.
> >>
> >>Bryan Pilati
> >>OM-2n; IS-3
> >>Va-USA
> >>Disclaimer: I'm always joking
> >>unless I should be serious.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|