Oops. Yeah, when I got home, I glanced at my beloved 100/2.8 and saw "E"
right on the filter ring! Darn, I hate it when I put my foot in my mouth.
I knew I'd be eating crow on the Oly List! LOL. I stand corrected. :)
By the way, it's not that I dislike the 200/4. It balances beautifully and
the fit-and-finish is really, really nice. The aperture ring is in the
"right" place of course. :) I never had a problem focussing it with the
1-series screens I've always had. It's a tad slow for the concert stuff
though so I never dared to try it wide open without a tripod at 1/60 in
stealth mode. I think the Tokina or Tamron 2.8 of my dreams will be a great
tool for that as I've been saying for days now.....
Lamadoo
From: <frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Please recount the elements in your 2.8/100.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|