ML Archiv: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?)

Subject:	[OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?)
From:	"Pete Prunskunas" <pyotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 13 May 2002 15:31:02 -0600

AG wrote:
>I shudder to contemplate ever needing to replace my 100/2.8.

AG, is your treasured 100mm f2.8 lens SC or MC?


Pete





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, AG Schnozz RE: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, Dave Shupe Re: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, --p.j. Re: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, AG Schnozz RE: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, AG Schnozz [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), Pete Prunskunas <= Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), AG Schnozz Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), dreammoose Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), AG Schnozz Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), Richard Allen Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), AG Schnozz Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), Richard Allen RE: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, AG Schnozz

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Zuiko vx. Zeiss, w shumaker
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, AG Schnozz
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] If anyone's looking for a 600/6.5, AG Schnozz
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?), AG Schnozz
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]