AG,
Help me here. What are you referring to as "serrated". What I mean is, where
are the serrations? And one other thing, don't all shudders such as the
OM's produce a starred effect as the lens opens up?
Thanks.
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: "AG Schnozz" <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Shuddering over 100/2.8 (was: 135mm f3.5 better than tests
show?)
> > Mine is ser # 1109xx. Do the images get better the older the
> > lens is?
>
> Hmm. Unknown, but we might start a craze here. I am curious as
> to when the iris changed. Mine is serrated at F4 and F5.6.
> Newer ones that I've looked at no longer have that
> characteristic.
>
> My lens also has a severe "star" affect with point-sourced
> lights. I'm thinking that there isn't any one thing, but the
> whole pool of design weaknesses that conspire to make an
> exceptional lens.
>
> I compare this lens to a nice over-stuffed easy-chair. A
> park-bench might be more properly shaped and designed for the
> "masses", but there is nothing like going home, kicking the
> foot-rest up, leaning back and chowing on a bowl of popcorn.
>
> AG-Scnozz
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> http://launch.yahoo.com
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|