I sometimes wonder why they didn't make cases that could hold the 135/2.8
with a filter and an lens cap!
I have cases for my 28 and my 135 and they are both quite torn, and they are
not new either, my parents bought them new with an OM-1MD. The lenses look
used but compared to their cases I'm glad that the lenses were protected
inside. Another thing I wonder is: that straps inside the case, how shall I
use them?
// Johan
Den 02-05-12 21.02, skrev "Jim Couch" <jamesbcouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I am pretty sure that both lenses use the same case. I know that the
> case I use for my 135 f/2.8 just says 135 on it. My lens fits fine with
> both front and rear caps.
>
> Having said that, I would be reluctant to purchase a lens from someone
> who was so cavalier in their care for the lens.
>
> Jim Couch
>
> Pete Prunskunas wrote:
>
>> I had a discussion with an ebay seller. He told me that he never
>> used a lens cap on the lens, but simply put the lens back into an
>> Olympus hard case. The lens was a 135mm f2.8 and the case
>> was for a 135mm f3.5. I suspect the lens would not have fit into
>> the case with the lens cap, as the f2.8 version is a little longer
>> than the f3.5 version. Am I being paranoid or does this sound
>> like a practice that might lead to a scratched rear element from
>> dust or dirt embedded in the bottom of the case?
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|