In my experience, the 28/3.5 is better than the 2.8 in both color and
resolution aspect (at f5.6).
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Prunskunas" <pyotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >From reading the archives and Gary's lens tests, the 28mm f2.0
> appears to be a fantastic lens, really sharp. But the other two
> seem to be neck and neck. The f2.8 is MC, so that's better,
> but according to Gary's tests, the f3.5 might even be a little
> sharper than the f2.8 at smaller apertures. Anyone want to
> share an opinion on the f3.5? If you find a mint version, is this
> lens a diamond in the rough, great value for the money?
>
>
> Pete
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|