--- Pete Prunskunas <pyotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From reading the archives and Gary's lens tests, the
> 28mm f2.0
> appears to be a fantastic lens, really sharp. But
> the other two
> seem to be neck and neck. The f2.8 is MC, so that's
> better,
> but according to Gary's tests, the f3.5 might even
> be a little
> sharper than the f2.8 at smaller apertures. Anyone
> want to
> share an opinion on the f3.5? If you find a mint
> version, is this
> lens a diamond in the rough, great value for the
> money?
>
>
> Pete
I have the f3.5 and it is a good value (two different
auctions on e-bug ended recently at about $50 each,
and I think both included the Oly case). The only
thing I don't like is how dark the screen is especally
at the edges and corners, hard to see the meter
sometimes, the f2.8 or a type 2 screen might help. I
just purchased this lens 2 weeks ago and have only
developed 2 rolls of B&W so far but the results have
been good. John Robison
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|