Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Without a lens cap

Subject: Re: [OM] Without a lens cap
From: "tom wagner" <sally30@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 13:14:48 -0400
If I'm not mistaken ...and I may be...the 135mm f2.8 has a 55mm filter ring with built-in lens hood. The 135mm f3.5 has a 49mm ring. So stuffing a 135 f2.8 into a 135 f3.5 might be a tight fit...?? It may work to protect the lens , but still you should have a lens cap...55mm caps are a little harder to find..


On Sun, 12 May 2002 08:15:42 -0600
 "Pete Prunskunas" <pyotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I had a discussion with an ebay seller. He told me that he never used a lens cap on the lens, but simply put the lens back into an Olympus hard case. The lens was a 135mm f2.8 and the case was for a 135mm f3.5. I suspect the lens would not have fit into the case with the lens cap, as the f2.8 version is a little longer than the f3.5 version. Am I being paranoid or does this sound like a practice that might lead to a scratched rear element from
dust or dirt embedded in the bottom of the case?


Pete




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List

< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz