Thanks Hans,
I'll have a look at a 2xA.
Daan
Pictures of Insects at:
http://www.kalmeijer.net
> : Hans, how is the quality of this combination? 0.6x doesn't sound that
much
> : compared to the 0.4x-0.5x magnifiaction without the converter.
>
> It's a difference of a covered subject area of 6x4cm (with 1.4x) vs.
8x5.5cm
> (w/o the converter). Indeed not spectacular. Why not directly put the 2xA
in
> between? This gives an area of about 4.5x3cm (0.8x).
>
> Image quality? Haven't shot any images with either combination, but the
> image in the viewfinder is still sharp from center to corner, there's no
> visible distortion and the tripod ring is still in good balance, so I
would
> be hopefull. Next step of course is putting *both* the 2xA and the 1.4xA
in
> between. This gives 3x2cm, magnification 1.2x, and still a relatively
large
> working distance. Insects will love it.
>
>
> hnz
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|