Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Unlikely uses for 1.4x

Subject: Re: [OM] Unlikely uses for 1.4x
From: "Daan Kalmeijer" <daan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:56:07 +0200

> : Careful! You might run into a conflict with this combo because I think
> : the 135 rear element protrudes as does the front element on the 1.4x-a.
> : Better make sure that the extension is deep enough both ways. Maybe the
> : telescoping extension tube would be deep enough, at least extended a
> : ways. But then there is the risk of banging the elements together when
> : you close it up. Now I'm curious, maybe I'll go measure them.
>
> Of course Daan was thinking of putting the 65-116 tube in between. There's
> no problem with this combi at all extensions.It gives a 190mm telemacro
with
> a working distance of 35cm - infinity and a magnification of 0.6x (6x4cm).
>
> hnz
>

Yes I was thinking of the 65-116 tube :-)

Hans, how is the quality of this combination? 0.6x doesn't sound that much
compared to the 0.4x-0.5x magnifiaction without the converter.

Daan

Pictures of Insects at:
www.kalmeijer.net



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz