Subject: | Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical orelectronic s... |
---|---|
From: | "Kam" <kamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:13:07 +0800 |
I intended to say "I'm NOT arguing ..." ----- Original Message ----- From: Kam To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:25 AM Subject: Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical orelectronic s... Hi George, I'm arguing for the sake of continuing an argument, but think that people are talking about collecting OM, not investing in OM. The 300mm arrived just now. Thanks. I'm collecting it for use, for fulfilment of a lacuna ... but not for investment :) Regards, Kam |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM][OT] Shooting monitors, John A. Lind |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Zuiko 300mm f4.5 for sale., Mark Hammons |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Collectible OM-3 condition-> was [OM] OM-1(n): mechanical orelectronic s..., Kam |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Collectible OM-3 condition, Dr. Oben Candemir |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |