This is exactly the kit I took with me on a seven day cyling trip in Colorado
last
summer. It worked very well overall, but I did wish for a little more reach than
the 135 provides on a couple of occasions. I often carry a 75-150 f4 Zuiko and
kind of wish I had for this trip. But most of the time the 135 works well. It is
light, compact and very affordable.
Jim Couch
Tacoma, WA USA
mike blayney wrote:
> Well I've just re-subscribed after 9 days in the Loire valley of France. I
> found that I carried around my OM2SP, 24mm 2.8, 35-70mm 3.5-4.5 and 135mm 3.5
> most of the time as it all fits snugly in a small Oyster camera bag. Why is
> this 135mm not more highly regarded? - it has good test results and is light
> and unobtrusive.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|