Mike Blayney wrote:
> ... I
> found that I carried around my OM2SP, 24mm 2.8, 35-70mm 3.5-4.5 and 135mm
3.5
> most of the time as it all fits snugly in a small Oyster camera bag. Why
is
> this 135mm not more highly regarded? - it has good test results and is
light
> and unobtrusive...
I've found mine to be very useful too:-
On a bellows while waiting for my 50/3.5 to turn up - excellent results and
with a bit of extra working distance;
With a 50/1.8 reversed on it as a low power microscope; and
With an eyepiece adapter to make a handy telescope.
I like the integral hood - mine's an early SC chrome nose and I think the
double chrome rings look really smart.
Regards,
- Keith
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|