> Well I've just re-subscribed after 9 days in the Loire valley of France. I
> found that I carried around my OM2SP, 24mm 2.8, 35-70mm 3.5-4.5 and 135mm 3.5
> most of the time as it all fits snugly in a small Oyster camera bag. Why is
> this 135mm not more highly regarded? -......
Mike
I seems that we think alike. I also determined this to be the ideal
travel kit. Depending on the occasion I might take a 2x or substitute
the 50 macro for the 35~70. For mountaineering I take the OM 1 rather
than rely on batteries and for a bit lighter kit skip the 35~70 and
bring a 28 instead of the 24. I agree that a 135mm is an excellent and
most useful lens.
And let's see those pictures!
Mike
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|