| Subject: | Re: [OM] What's the big deal with the 40mm 2.0? |
|---|---|
| From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2001 06:15:30 -0500 (EST) |
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Andrew Dacey wrote:
> Just curious why so many people mention the 40mm 2.0 as being up there
> with the ultimates as far as the Zuiko collection is concerned.
> Is it a rarity thing or a quality thing? Or just a "must own every
> Zuiko" thing?
Yes.
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Calling on the list to help with new project, Francois Rossi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Calling on the list to help with new project, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] What's the big deal with the 40mm 2.0?, John A. Lind |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] What's the big deal with the 40mm 2.0?, DaEyeGuy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |