>Just curious why so many people mention the 40mm 2.0 as being up there
>with the ultimates as far as the Zuiko collection is concerned.
>
>Is it a rarity thing or a quality thing? Or just a "must own every
>Zuiko" thing?
>
>--
>Andrew "Frugal" Dacey,
Ah - Olympus. The only context where "mine's smaller than yours" is a
boast. Nice focal length, nice size ('pancake style'), rare-ish, merely
adequate performer by most reports. I think most 'users' would prefer a
35/2.
I shall now duck for cover!
Andrew
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|