Subject: | [OM] What's the big deal with the 40mm 2.0? |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Dacey <frugal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:47:12 -0400 |
Just curious why so many people mention the 40mm 2.0 as being up there with the ultimates as far as the Zuiko collection is concerned. Is it a rarity thing or a quality thing? Or just a "must own every Zuiko" thing? -- Andrew "Frugal" Dacey, frugal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.tildefrugal.net/ < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Skins was Re: [OM] thoughts on ...etc........., Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Sv: [OM] OM-2n at EI 1600??, James N. McBride |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Shoe for OM2 and T-20, DAVDOU9211 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] What's the big deal with the 40mm 2.0?, Tom Scales |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |