ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Baffled

Subject:	Re: [OM] Baffled
From:	Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:47:57 -0700

Hi Tom:

Your 50-250mm f/5 doesn't change effective aperture when zoomed.  Trust
me, I tested it and the slides were consistent for an equal aperture at
various focal lengths. The difference you experienced in metering must
have been due to the subject area being read by the meter.

Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Photo Techniques' 25 Best Cameras, (continued) Re: [OM] Photo Techniques' 25 Best Cameras, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Photo Techniques' 25 Best Cameras, Keith Berry Re: [OM] Photo Techniques' 25 Best Cameras, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Photo Techniques' 25 Best Cameras, John Pendley Re: [OM] Baffled, k.matsumoto Re: [OM] Baffled, Giles Re: [OM] Baffled, frieder . faig Re: [OM] Baffled, DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] Baffled, Acer V Re: [OM] Baffled, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Baffled, Gary Reese <= Re: [OM] Baffled, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Baffled, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Baffled, Lex Jenkins Re: [OM] Baffled, DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] Baffled, Dylan

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Remoting T-series Flash(es) from the BG-2 Handle, HI100
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] ....... Difference in film reflectance......, HI100
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Baffled, Chris Barker
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Baffled, Andrew Fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]