ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Baffled

Subject:	Re: [OM] Baffled
From:	DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:22:01 EDT

Now that more knowledgable heads have prevailed I stand corrected.  It makes 
sense that the area covered by the zooming lens would vary and could vary the 
reading.  

Dave Dougherty

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Baffled, (continued) Re: [OM] Baffled, k.matsumoto Re: [OM] Baffled, Giles Re: [OM] Baffled, frieder . faig Re: [OM] Baffled, DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] Baffled, Acer V Re: [OM] Baffled, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Baffled, Gary Reese Re: [OM] Baffled, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Baffled, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Baffled, Lex Jenkins Re: [OM] Baffled, DAVDOU9211 <= Re: [OM] Baffled, Dylan

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Baffled, Chris Barker
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OLY 350mm f/2.8, Barry B. Bean
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Baffled, Lex Jenkins
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Baffled, Dylan
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]