At 08:29 AM 9/3/2000 -0500, Joel Wilcox wrote:
[snip]
>Sometimes I think the only reason I keep my modest little Nikon system
>going is a very beat up Nikkor 85/1.8 (with only six blades) that plays
>second fiddle to no lens in its class (i.e., Zuiko 85/2; not sure the 90/2
>isn't in a class by itself). Also, the 55/2.8 micro ain't no buffalo chip.
>
>Here's a bakeoff between the Nikkor 85/1.8 AI and Zuiko 85/2:
>
>http://avalon.net/~jdub/bokeh.htm
>
>Need I say, however, that the Nikkor is twice as big as the Zuiko?
Is it my imagination, or does the Zuiko-imaged pic display a slightly shallower
depth-of-field, causing the "bokeh'ed" background to appear softer? Were both
pics taken at the same lens-to-subject distance, Joel?
Oh wait, the remarks at the bottom of the page state that you used an
equivalent unsharp mask in Photoshop on both images. Hmmm...
Garth
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|