At 08:26 AM 9/3/2000 GMT, you wrote:
>You're right, it really isn't that bad. And, honestly, Nikkor bokeh ain't
>horrible. But if you can get wonderfully smooth, creamy rich ... oh, wait a
>sec ... got distracted there ...
>
>Lex
Sometimes I think the only reason I keep my modest little Nikon system
going is a very beat up Nikkor 85/1.8 (with only six blades) that plays
second fiddle to no lens in its class (i.e., Zuiko 85/2; not sure the 90/2
isn't in a class by itself). Also, the 55/2.8 micro ain't no buffalo chip.
Here's a bakeoff between the Nikkor 85/1.8 AI and Zuiko 85/2:
http://avalon.net/~jdub/bokeh.htm
Need I say, however, that the Nikkor is twice as big as the Zuiko?
Joel Wilcox
Iowa City, Iowa USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|