I have a suggestion here, the background of the photos are quite far
away as compared to the object, both are very soft (although I also
found the Zuiko 85/2 looks better). To give more challenge to the
lens, you may want to move a bit away from your subject to make the
background more harsh. Or make a few shot with different subject to
background ratio. Also using the same film will be much easier for
scan and comparison, slide would be the best for scanning.
C.H.Ling
Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> ..........
>
> Not sure what the "Hmmm" means. :-)
>
> I'm not sure how valid the comparison is not using the same film in both
> cases. I was surprised at the difference. The Provia/Zuiko image didn't
> "pop" as readily as the RSXII-50/Nikkor. I wouldn't have bothered putting
> them out there if there hadn't been this discussion of bokeh. Then again
> maybe there's not enough going on in the background to evaluate the bokeh
> in this case. I'll leave that to the true believers to evaluate. ;^)
>
> Joel Wilcox
> Iowa City, Iowa USA
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|