On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Giles wrote:
>
>This does not sound terribly practical. If you are bracketing each way
>then say that is three exposures. Then you need another three for the
>archival copy. That is 6 shots for your one keeper. I am not questioning
>the cost of the film, just the practicality of this and the discipline
>required. We can all see the family happily standing around while we
>shoot 6 of everything can't we ?
True. I was thinking more along the lines of tricky exposure for
bracketing (exposure), and shooting once more for those shots taht you
knew are spot-on.
>A problem I would have is that I often don't know what is a great shot
>in advance of getting the film processed.
Yupp-o, and often that shot you take on second thought turns out better
than the one you spend 15 minutes composing.... Been there, done that.
>It might be more practical to have your greatest shots duplicated once a
>year.
Or scanned :)
/Acer V
--
Coming soon to a browser near you: The Whole Sort Of General Mish Mash,
now frames-enriched at no extra-charge!
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|