This does not sound terribly practical. If you are bracketing each way
then say that is three exposures. Then you need another three for the
archival copy. That is 6 shots for your one keeper. I am not questioning
the cost of the film, just the practicality of this and the discipline
required. We can all see the family happily standing around while we
shoot 6 of everything can't we ?
A problem I would have is that I often don't know what is a great shot
in advance of getting the film processed.
It might be more practical to have your greatest shots duplicated once a
year.
Giles
Acer V wrote:
> I'm planning on taking two identical shots on KChrome if I think it is
> something truly spectacular. That way, you can keep one in archive, and
> project one...in fact, it's a good idea to double to treble the
> once-in-a-life shots, exposure/compositional bracketing not
> withstanding. This way, no need to worry about the losses and contrast
> gain inherent in duping. Yes?
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|