A lot of weight? A 230g difference between a 50mm f2 and a 90mm f2 is not
what I would exactly call a lot - in the scheme of things.
All my shots in the Oly Gallery taken with the 90/2 were done without a
tripod (I have one now ;-)
Giles
Hans van Veluwen wrote:
> A lot of weight. That is, from the lens. You might loose weight by carrying
> it.
> heavy too. Since weight is an issue, stick to the 50mm/3.5 lens. The 50mm/F2
> and
> 90mm/F2 macro's are supposed to be superior, but unless you're prepared to
> carry a
> rocksteady tripod it will never show in your pictures.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|