You could also consider the Zuiko 90mm f2 macro and 65-116 auto extension
tube. I think this would be a more versatile combination as the 90mm
could in most circumstances be used without the 65-116 while the 135 can
not. Also, this combination would be easier to focus and have performance
that should at least equal that of the 135mm f4.5 macro.
I agree about things of high quality.
Giles
tatu_laitinen@xxxxxxx wrote:
> A better idea is to get both 80mm f4 and 135mm f4.5 macros on 65-116
> extension. They are a bit more slower to use
> than 90mm macros, but the results are simply fantastic! If you are really
> serious about close-up/macro photography
> In a longer run its much wiser to invest on higher quality (more expensive)
> equipment than to buy cheap products
> that will not last for long.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|