MHeath writes:
<< I considered the Macro, but the lens test site rates it a C
or B- for its two widest apertures (if I remember correctly). The 1.4 was
tops wide open, but others have said the 1.2 is better. I would not buy the
1.2 if the difference is small. >>
Based on my retest of the 90mm f/2 Macro with a OM-2000, I'm about to retest
the 50mm f/2 with the same camera. Given that the 50mm f/2 is a heavy lens,
it's performance may improve at f/2 and f/2.8, just like the 90mm f/2 did
using mirror and aperture prefire and a vertical shutter.
Also in line for a test is a 28-85mm f/2.8 Vivitar Series 1 (Varifocal) I
just picked up.
I suspect we will have some results from a 50mm f/1.2 Zuiko in the
foreseeable future.
Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|